San Diego – Things are getting really grim for education in this state and especially for the Community Colleges. Under the best case scenario we will lose at least 200 course sections at City College by next Fall Semester. And it could double that number if the State continues to place more emphasis on protecting prison guards and prisoners, prohibiting drilling and refining, and making sure the snail darter and delta smelt are accorded more attention and sympathy than it provides for educating its next generation. Never mind that without the education that a college offers, individuals will only get lower paid jobs and the tax base to pay for all of those entitled victims feeding at the public trough will get smaller and smaller, or that as taxes rise the employers themselves will continue, as they have already started, to leave for better business environments and with them more contributors to that tax base will evaporate.
Of course that scenario is mirrored by the Federal government as well which seems determined to spend more, not less, and to adopt as a solution to cash needs the expedient of printing money and loaning it to itself using the wonderful euphemism of “Quantitative Easing” or QE. Is there no one that reads history? Are the sycophants of King Barrack or Count Bernacke so willfully blind they refuse to even consider the obvious. They are all in thrall to the liberal economic theory of John Maynard Keynes but they are so without having actually READ Keynes’s work. And if they did, they quickly turned the page when he wrote, “There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency.” As Milton Friedman noted, only a government can take expensive paper and very good ink and turn the combination into something worthless.
The really scary thing is that maybe they DO know. Perhaps they are all as smart as claimed and this is not slipping by them, it is being done on purpose. How did Keynes phrase it? “…overturning the existing basis of society.” Does that sound like “transforming” society to you? Before you can transform or overturn a society, unless you are already starting with a generally illiterate populace or one used to autocracies, you have to seriously dumb it down and make it dependent on the authority to keep the food trough filled. Hmmmmmm. And what better way of doing that than to start the devaluation of both the currency and the educational system?
A growing cadre of financial advisors and economists are trying to sound the alarm bell that we are heading toward catastrophic inflation but are ignored by the mainstream press. The government denies it absolutely and tells us instead, in a wonderful example of a magician’s trick, that we are in lessening danger of DEflation. But gas at the pump has doubled in the past two years. The increasing fuel costs have increased food costs (it takes fuel for farm implements, transportation, power to stores, and GETTING to the stores) to, in some cases, nearly 50% in that same period. People may do little more than complain about gas but when they start cutting back on food it will get their undivided attention. If we, as a society, sheepishly accept that and then accept the sure-to-follow offer of the government to step in and provide for us, then it is hard to see how something could be more transformative from a self reliant people to a dependent people. it will be a redistribution of wealth all right, redistributed from he people who earned it to the government so they can pay down the debt and get their credit back.
Machiavelli would be proud of King Barrack if he pulls that one off. Political “good” is achieved when an environment is created that allows citizens to be self reliant and self sufficient and enjoy the fruits of their own labor. Political “Evil” is achieved when the citizens are made dependent upon the government or “village” to survive. And what would we call such a system?
Using labels to demonize philosophical opponents is a scurrilous, but effective trick because it halts debate and clouds issues behind an emotional smokescreen, so I am not going to assert that our progressive thinkers are one thing or another. I would assert however that their ideas and ideals are more closely aligned with those of William Godwin than of John Locke, more clearly flowing from Jean Jaques Rousseau than from Edmund Burke, far more consistent with the thinking of Karl Marx than of Thomas Jefferson, and would garner greater enthusiasm from Gus Hall than from John Kennedy. And in that is a message that is both critically important and generally ignored.
The silence is deafening and i can see “deer-in-the-headlights” stares aimed at me. What? “Who are those people?” you ask. If you do not know and do not know what they all stood for then I would suggest you have no business taking part in the political discourse and debate because without knowing how we got to where we are you can have no idea where it is going. It is like mathematically trying to draw a trend line based on a single data point. If you want to know the truth about someone’s foundational beliefs and where they are likely to lead, then you must understand the foundations of those beliefs. And if you will do that, and God knows the web can make it far easier for you than it was in the old days of actually having to have or go to a library and, gasp, READ something, then you may be somewhat unsettled by the information and find yourself needing to rethink things a bit. In doing so you will start, finally, to become one of those “informed citizens” Jefferson said was essential to the success of democracy. Perhaps you will read and understand the fear the founders had when Madison, and Jefferson, philosophical opponents in may ways, agreed that the greatest danger would come when the people realized that they could, directly or indirectly, write themselves a check from the public treasury.
We are there now. The danger is bleak and at the gates. The only question of value at this point is are you going to man the walls to fight it off or run down and open the gates? Or does it matter? Have we in fact, as some economists are saying, passed the tipping point from where recovery without tumult is no longer possible? If so it will be because too many people sat on their hands and researched no more deeply than the talking points of their chosen party, steeped themselves in the profound philosophies of bumper stickers, and blindly followed those choir masters of the chosen choir. If this culture and country craters around our ears then those blind followers are the people to blame.
Perhaps it will be too late for California’s education system to recover and it, along with the State’s economy, will need to collapse and wait to be rebuilt until the wreckage of its current policies is utterly inescapable to anyone willing to look. Perhaps it will be the same for the State’s economy and, for that matter, the Country. I hope not but I must confess I am no longer optimistic.